the Business Forum and
the Economic Partnership
in Brighton & Hove
Homepage    BCRP Intranet    Funding    Events    Partners     Knowledgebase    Links    About us     Contact us
Key projects
Crime
reduction
 


Inward
investment
information
 


Licensee
Forum
 

Workforce development 

Transport
 

Business &
climate
change

Property &
Development sites

Business
Improvement
Districts

Housing
 

Strategy
 

Consultation opportunities
 

Brighton & Hove Business Forum
8-11 Pavilion Buildings, Brighton, BN1 1EE
Tel: 01273 735442
Email: info@brighton
business.co.uk

© Brighton & Hove
Business Forum

News - 7 May 2012
Toads Hole Valley

Who are they saving it for?

As the Conservative and Labour groups on the city council prepare to present their petition to “save” Toads Hole Valley from development next week it is worth revisiting the facts behind the site to determine whether their intentions are misguided.

The 47 hectare green field in question was once connected to the wider South Downs but was left stranded by the construction of the bypass which rendered it difficult to access and unviable to farm. When the boundaries for the new South Downs National Park were determined, the valley wasn’t included because it was not deemed to be of sufficient landscape quality.

From the air, it is easy to see why; apart from its western bank it consists mainly of unexceptional scrub deeply scarred by the tracks of joy riders who use it as a motocross course. It contrasts sharply with the lush, green rolling Downs on the other side of the A27.

Of course, bikers using it as an unofficial motocross are breaking the law because it is private land. As the “no trespassing” signs around the perimeter testify, anyone who sets foot on it is guilty, whether scramble bikers or dog walkers or ramblers. Many people think that it belongs to the city but it has actually been privately owned by the Cook family for over seven decades.

It is a shame that, apart from a tiny patch with SNCI designation, access to such a large expanse – the equivalent of 64 football pitches – is denied to the people; even more so because the Brighton & Hove Open Space, Sports & Recreation Study highlights this as a location that requires more publicly accessible open space. And that isn’t the only type of space that is in short supply; the need for a new primary school in the area is becoming increasingly desperate.

The Green Administration is proposing to include the valley in the City Plan [Core Strategy] so that part of it could be developed to provide much needed homes and a new school; all with the impressive environmental credentials that the city demands. It could also accommodate some ultra-sustainable employment space linked to the universities just five minutes along the bypass. Well over a third of the site wouldn’t be built on at all becoming open parkland properly managed to encourage biodiversity. The development could follow the principles of One Planet Living like BioRegional Quintain's One Brighton in the New England Quarter.

Some people have already started to lament the loss of a green field but in truth we don’t have one to lose. It belongs to the Cook family who have shown themselves admirably willing to work with the city’s planners to address the city’s needs.

If we play our cards right the city could gain a green space but if we "save" the valley, we may see it disappear. Under the coalition government’s National Planning Policy Framework [NPPF] [see earlier story] if Toads Hole Valley isn’t included in our City Plan there will be nothing to stop the owners from submitting a planning application for as many houses as the site can carry. The NPPF proposes a “presumption” in favour of developments if they are deemed sustainable [and there is no legally binding definition] [see earlier story].

Fortunately the owners have no desire to do this preferring instead to work with the local authority to provide a comprehensive mixed use scheme to meet the long term needs of the city. They have owned this site for 70 years; no one could accuse them of having short-term interests.

The politicians who are busy compiling petitions to “save” the site need to ask themselves who they are actually saving it for. The 12,000 people on the Council’s housing waiting list or the 6,000 additional people who will be looking for a job by 2014 or the 150 children who will be shoehorned into already overstretched primary schools this year won't thank them for "saving" something that we can only look at from afar.

It is unfortunate that the Valley is in a ward [Hangleton & Knoll] that is split between two political parties, Labour and Conservative, each playing to their respective galleries. And it was telling that, during the earlier consultation on the four options papers for the City Plan [see earlier story], not one single consultation group voted to “save” the valley, instead they all saw the sense of developing a part of it with desperately needed homes and workspace so that the rest could be gifted to the city and people could enjoy it without breaking the law.

There's no room for party politics in this debate. 


Read related items on:
Development sites
Local policy
National Planning Policy Framework
Toads Hole Valley


Browse our business Knowledgebase or search by keyword


Headlines

21 May 2013
IEMA foundation course in Environmental Auditing
18 May 2013
New leader for Labour Group 17 May 2013
Employee fees for tribunal claims to be introduced in July 17 May 2013
Social media in the dock 16 May 2013
Could your business benefit from having a student placement? 13 May 2013
City Council Health & Safety Service Plan Consutation 13 May 2013
Government promotes micro businesses 11 May 2013
Roger French granted Freedom of the City 11 May 2013
400 and counting 9 May 2013
Brighton house price update 2013 Q1 9 May 2013
City Plan holed above the water line 7 May 2013
The UK economy is up the Swanee but where is Brighton? 2 May 2013
Top 5 stories in April 2013 30 April 2013
Circus Street consultation proves a popular event 29 April 2013
Auto enrolment tsunami 27 April 2013
UK economy avoids the triple dip 27 April 2013
Brighton's Big Screen on the beach returns 27 April 2013
Anston House to remain derelict 27 April 2013
Brunswick Marina scheme to start laying bricks 26 April 2013
Brighton's tech sector 25 April 2013
City Deal preferred to Single Pot 24 April 2013
Businesses continue to register for the Living Wage 23 April 2013
Conservative opposition calls for review of city protests 22 April 2013
Shoreham joins the Biosphere bid 22 April 2013
One Planet City 19 April 2013
March for England: police issue legal notices to separate marchers from protesters 18 April 2013
£200m regeneration of Circus Street 18 April 2013
Work starts on new sea view homes 17 April 2013
Labour leader to step down 17 April 2013
Open University MBA information event 16 April 2013
Free training for SMEs in business resilience 15 April 2013
£92,000 training boost for employers 14 April 2013
What's the Big Deal? 13 April 2013
March for England disruption 12 April 2013
Edward Street Quarter - Draft Planning Brief Consultation 10 April 2013
Free breakfast event to promote hospitality apprenticeships 9 April 2013
Rampion Wind Farm application accepted for examination by Secretary of State 7 April 2013
Free seminar on new pension obligations for employers 7 April 2013
Pizza sales will save the UK from triple dip recession 6 April 2013
Jessops resurrected. But will it work?